View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
jaster is back in black Mod Emperor of Dune
Joined: 11 Sep 2007 Posts: 3084
|
Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2009 11:34 am Post subject: In Vitro Gone Wrong |
|
|
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32950836/ns/today-today_health/
A fertility clinic implants a women with the wrong embryo.
Ouch. _________________ When I am weaker than you, I ask you for freedom because that is according to your principles; when I am stronger than you, I take away your freedom because that is according to my principles.
-Children of Dune, attributed to Louis Veuillot |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
lizakova is shinying up her life. Kitty Guardian
Joined: 11 Sep 2007 Posts: 1303
|
Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2009 12:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Why did they have to give up the child though? Carrying the kid for 9 months has to count for something. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jaster is back in black Mod Emperor of Dune
Joined: 11 Sep 2007 Posts: 3084
|
Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2009 1:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
lizakova wrote: | Why did they have to give up the child though? Carrying the kid for 9 months has to count for something. |
The embryo doesn't belong to them. Carrying the kid for nine months counts for nothing, in that respect.
In a purely moral sense, think about it the other way: should the couple that created the embryo lose their (biological) child because of fertility clinic incompetence? Most, I think, would say no.
The woman carrying the kid did, however, have the right to abort the pregnancy, which is interesting. _________________ When I am weaker than you, I ask you for freedom because that is according to your principles; when I am stronger than you, I take away your freedom because that is according to my principles.
-Children of Dune, attributed to Louis Veuillot |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mchicken is dejected. Cover of Rush's Seminal Album
Joined: 11 Sep 2007 Posts: 3835
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jaster is back in black Mod Emperor of Dune
Joined: 11 Sep 2007 Posts: 3084
|
Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2009 2:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I just meant that it is interesting in the sense that one could construct an argument resting on the principles underlying the fact that the carrier has no legal (moral) claim to the resultant baby to argue that the carrier should not be allowed to abort it. I'm not saying I would agree, but I just think it interesting that some might very well make such an argument.
It's kind of like that episode of Family Guy wherein Peter had to carry the nest of endangered birds in his beard. _________________ When I am weaker than you, I ask you for freedom because that is according to your principles; when I am stronger than you, I take away your freedom because that is according to my principles.
-Children of Dune, attributed to Louis Veuillot |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|